Should Humans Use Animals to Conduct Tests?
The answer depends on who you ask. You have some people on one side who are completely for testing on animals because they believe it will lead to improvements in medicine, hygiene products, etc. But on the other side you have people who are completely against animal testing because it is morally wrong in their opinions. Today i will be sharing my opinion on the subject.
I was looking through my English book, Argument! earlier today until i came across a photo on page 358 of two people holding up a sign that said, "SAVE HUMAN LIVES TEST ON ANIMALS". These two people were obviously protesting in favor of animal testing, but i'm writing this blog today because i think animal testing is wrong and unnecessary. I understand that animal testing can be useful when conducting research, but i don't think it is absolutely necessary.
I believe there are other ways for scientists to conduct research that don't involve harming animals for testing purposes. For example, a human would make a great test subject when conducting a test for human products. When i say a human, i mean a volunteer who is alive and perfectly happy donating their body to scientists. Why should we use innocent animals when we have volunteers? Most people don't see it the way i do, and they continue to use these animals as testing subjects for their own selfish purposes.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but before you pick a side make sure you're picking the side you actually share the belief with and not just the side that is more socially acceptable.
References:
Messenger, Erica, John Gooch and Dorothy U. Seyler. Argument! United States of America: Mcgraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2011. Print.





